Markets

Are presidential elections good for US and global stockmarkets?

How have stockmarkets performed in previous election years? Our analysis points to weaker gains during the race for the White House.

03/11/2016

David Brett

David Brett

Investment Writer

The US stockmarket rose by a cumulative 73% during the 11 election years since 1972, according to data analysed by Schroders.

The annualised gains for the S&P 500 in the combined election years was only 7% compared to 8% for the whole period between 1972 and 2012.

Ten of the 11 election years registered gains with Nixon and Reagan victories coinciding with the biggest gains.

The trends in the US were reflected in global stockmarkets with the UK’s FTSE All-Share also shown for comparison.

The only election year that the S&P 500, the MSCI World and the FTSE All-Share all registered falls was 2008. The losses averaged 38% that year amid the turmoil of the financial crisis.

However, during the last 11 US election years (not including 2016) stocks on the S&P 500, the MSCI World, and the FTSE All-Share have made a cumulative gains, not including dividends, of 73%, 49% and 74%, respectively. If gains made so far in 2016 are included, these figures jump to 79%, 53% and 86%, respectively.

The S&P 500 has made gains in nine out of the last 11 US election years. The MSCI World and the FTSE All-Share have each gained in eight of these years.

We are told markets hate uncertainty. Given the unpredictability of election outcomes it might, therefore, be surprising to see the frequency with which equities rise in polling years.

Do markets outperform in Republican years?

Traditional thinking goes that a win for the Republicans is better for markets due to the pro-capitalist policies that are expected to follow. The data appears to support the assumption.

However, there is a huge caveat. The Democrat data is skewed by the crash of 2008, the seeds of which had been sown during the tenure of previous presidents.

Adjust the data to remove 2008 and the S&P 500, on average, outperforms in the years when the Democrats won control of the White House.

How do markets perform during a president’s term?

While markets in the year of a presidential election tend to outperform when a Republican wins office, no clear trend emerges on how the S&P 500 performs over the president’s entire term.

For instance, the S&P 500 rose more during Barack Obama’s (Democrat) reign than during Richard Nixon’s (Republican) tenure, while the Reagan (Republican) years outperformed Kennedy’s (Democrat) rule.

Long-term investing vs market timing

There is also a lesson for investors who might choose to time the market, perhaps believing they should buy in election years.

Average returns for those 11 election years were lower than for the entire period between 1972 and 2012.

In the case of the MSCI World Index and the FTSE All-Share Index, you would have been much better off staying invested in stocks over the entire 44-year period, rather than buying and selling in election years.

The average return for the MSCI World and the FTSE All-Share was 8% and 10% respectively per year between 1972 and 2012, compared with 4% and 7% respectively for the election years during the same period.

The S&P 500 also returned a higher average per year between 1972 and 2012 compared with just the election years, although the difference was not so great; 8% compared with 7%.

Taking a longer-term view of their investments would have also helped smooth out the volatility experienced over such a long period, particularly if you had invested in 2008. 

Important information

This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the named author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds.

This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroder Investment Management Ltd (Schroders) does not warrant its completeness or accuracy.

The data has been sourced by Schroders and should be independently verified before further publication or use. No responsibility can be accepted for error of fact or opinion. This does not exclude or restrict any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended from time to time) or any other regulatory system. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions.

Past Performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.  Exchange rate changes may cause the value of any overseas investments to rise or fall.

Any sectors, securities, regions or countries shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy or sell.

The forecasts included should not be relied upon, are not guaranteed and are provided only as at the date of issue. Our forecasts are based on our own assumptions which may change. Forecasts and assumptions may be affected by external economic or other factors.

Issued by Schroder Unit Trusts Limited, 1 London Wall Place, London EC2Y 5AU. Registered Number 4191730 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.