Can individual football results affect share prices?

If value investors do all they can to keep emotions out of their process, yet at the same time emotions are an integral part of football, what would be the value investing take on buying into a listed football club?


Andrew Evans

Andrew Evans

Fund Manager, Equity Value

Emotions are a funny old game.

We may do all we can to exclude them from our investment process, here on The Value Perspective, and yet clearly they are an integral part of football.

That being so, what is the value investing take on buying into listed football clubs?

Seeing as the quarter-finals of the Champions League kick off shortly – and especially given certain events in the previous round – it is a timely question.

Small caveat 

Before we go any further, we'd like to state we are not recommending to invest in or divest from Juventus in any way, it is being used purely to illustrate a point. We  also freely admit we are about to impose a narrative on recent events – something we have often cautioned against in the past, once even in the footballing context of the supposed dangers of a 2-0 lead.

Still, as you will see, we are doing so in a very precise way and for a good cause so, caveat duly offered, take a look at the following graph of the recent share price moves of Italian football giant Juventus.


6 month share price of Juventus


Source: LSE as at 05-Apr-2019

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. 


Let’s now consider some key dates in the race to win this season’s Champions League over the last six months – the first two being 27 November 2018, when Juventus sealed their place in the last 16 with a game to spare after beating Valencia 1-0 at home; and 17 December 2018, when the club drew Atletico Madrid, one of the competition’s tougher teams over the last five or six years, in the round of 16.

As you can see, investors did not react in any obvious way, perhaps – and we merely raise the possibility – because there were more general market concerns at the end of last year.

Furthermore, you might reasonably add, the club is almost two-thirds owned by a company controlled by the Agnelli industrial dynasty, which would dampen price volatility – and, anyway, why would anyone think football matches moved markets?

At which point, we would draw your attention to two further dates – 20 February 2019, when Juventus lost 2-0 away to Atletico in the first leg of their round-of-16 tie; and 12 March 2019 when, courtesy of a Cristiano Ronaldo hat-trick, they progressed to the quarter-final stage, which will see them pitted against Real Madrid’s youthful conquerors Ajax.

The day after the first tie was lost, the share price fell more than 10% from €1.45 to €1.29 while, within a few minutes of the market opening on the morning after the 3-2 aggregate victory was confirmed, the share price bounced back 21% from €1.22 to €1.50 before ending the day at €1.44.

At that highpoint, the club’s market capitalisation (the share price multiplied by the amount of shares issued) was roughly €1.5bn meaning Ronaldo’s hat-trick had ostensibly added €200m of value.

Can a hat-trick be worth €200m?

Can that really be what happened?

As we say, there are no guarantees – and investors did not seem unduly bothered one way or the other after Juventus were drawn against Ajax on 15 March or Ronaldo injured himself while on international duty with Portugal 10 days later.

Even so, the price moves of 21 February and 13 March do seem very time-specific reactions to very time-specific events.

In which case, this is another example of the madness of markets because how much money can we say for sure is at stake here?

Well, according to European football’s governing body UEFA, having already picked up €9.5m from qualifying for the round of 16, Juventus has now guaranteed itself another €10.5m by qualifying for the quarter-final.

Yet even with the potential of a respective €12m, €15m and €4m for making it through to the semi-final and final and winning the Champions League, that is still only a fifth of the €200m that was added to Juventus’s market capitalisation the morning after beating Atletico.

To return to our opening question – yes, we would consider buying into a football club through the same objective basis we weigh up any other investment. 

As for emotion, though, we’ll save that for cheering on our favourite teams.


All stock mentions are for illustrative purposes only and not a recommendation to buy or sell.


Andrew Evans

Andrew Evans

Fund Manager, Equity Value

I joined Schroders in 2015 as a member of the Value Investment team. Prior to joining Schroders I was responsible for the UK research process at Threadneedle. I began my investment career in 2001 at Dresdner Kleinwort as a Pan-European transport analyst. 

Don’t miss the latest value investing ideas.

Enter your email for alerts on new posts from The Value Perspective team.

We store your information securely, and we never share it with third parties. We'll only send you emails relevant to you and you can opt out at any time.

Important Information:

The views and opinions displayed are those of Ian Kelly, Nick Kirrage, Andrew Lyddon, Kevin Murphy, Andrew Williams, Andrew Evans and Simon Adler, members of the Schroder Global Value Equity Team (the Value Perspective Team), and other independent commentators where stated. They do not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders' communications, strategies or funds. The Team has expressed its own views and opinions on this website and these may change.

This article is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information on the website when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. The sectors/securities shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered a recommendation to buy/sell.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amounts originally invested.